![]() Git will then perform the rebase operation according to the actions you have specified. Once you have made the changes, save and close the editor.You can reorder the lines to change the order of the commits or change the action for each commit, for example, if you want to change the commit message of a particular commit, you can change the “pick” line to “reword”.The lines starting with “pick” represent the actual commits, and the actions you can perform on them include “pick”, “reword”, “edit”, “squash”, “fixup”. A text editor will open showing a list of the last 3 commits in the branch.Start the interactive rebase: git rebase -i HEAD~3 (This will allow you to rebase the last 3 commits).Switch to the branch you want to rebase: git checkout my-branch.Fetch the latest changes from the upstream repository: git fetch origin.Here is an example of how you can perform an interactive rebase in Git: It is performed using the “git rebase” command with the “–interactive” or “-i” option. Interactive rebasing is a Git feature that allows you to alter the entire branch history, including squashing multiple commits into one, reordering commits, changing commit messages, and more. Note: The -f flag is used to force-push the changes to the remote repository, as rebasing changes the branch history. Finally, push the updated branch to the remote repository: git push -f.Continue the rebase by running git rebase -continue.If there are any conflicts, resolve them by editing the conflicting files and running git add to mark them as resolved.Then, run the rebase command: git rebase.First, switch to the branch you want to apply the changes to: git checkout.Avoiding the introduction of merge commits, which in the long run, become difficult to revert.Here’s an example of how to use Git rebase:.Keeping the branching history clean for the master branch.There are two reasons behind selecting rebasing over merging: Different teams run their automation suites in the Pre-QA env, and, if everything goes fine, then we port the develop branch changes over to the master branch. That’s why every day, we build the develop branch and deploy it to our Pre-QA environment. This branching concept is meant to catch bugs early in the development stage. Then, all of the development changes get merged to the develop branch. Developers must generate feature/bugfix branches from develop, and PR checks run on the develop branch. For our Harness-core repo, we have a develop branch that works as a default branch. We recently introduced a new branching strategy at Harness to keep the master branch clean and streamline our release process. Ideally, this process should be automated and managed with less manual intervention. This is a critical process for the companies that deal with other companies’ releases as their base branch for development, and that release products out of them. Any other third-party mobile companies that take the release branch from the chipset companies follow similar strategies. ![]() Based on the fixes available in the previous release branch, as well as the complexity of the changes, they decide whether to select rebasing and merging. The strategy of merging/rebasing is essential in finalizing the release strategy. Google releases a branch, and the chipset company, such as Qualcomm, takes the branch and decides on a different long-term strategy to manage it and eventually release. This is where interactive rebasing comes in: it lets you selectively pick the commits that you want, and works better than cherry-picking when there is a large number of commits.īranch mirroring and rebasing: This is something I have faced when working with android projects. The master/main branch might also contain multiple commits for other features/bug fixes. For example, I am working in Feature-X development in my feature branch, and some commits went into the master branch that affects Feature-X. Interactive rebasing: This is an important feature regarding rebasing, as it gives power to developers to selectively pick the commits that they want in their feature branch. Lastly, from the above diagram, we can see that it helps keep the branching history linear. Furthermore, it avoids the introduction of extra merge commits. Advantage: Rebasing helps keep our branch history cleaner.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |